jump to navigation

The Green Bubble is about to Burst November 5, 2010

Posted by honestclimate in Discussions.
Tags: , ,

The Green Bubble is about to Burst

By S. Fred Singer
American Thinker, November 5, 2010

There is a revolution coming that is likely to burst the green global warming bubble: the temperature trend used by the IPCC (the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) to support their conclusion about anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is likely to turn out to be fake. The situation will become clear once Virginia’s attorney general, Kenneth Cuccinelli, obtains information now buried in e-mails at the University of Virginia. Or Hearings on Climategate by the U.S. Congress may uncover the “smoking gun” that demonstrates that the warming trend used by the IPCC does not really exist.

It has become increasingly clear that any observed warming during the past century is of natural origin and that the human contribution is insignificant. It is doubtful that any significant warming is attributable to greenhouse gases at all.

Once the public accepts these scientific conclusions, it should have immense consequences for policy. It will mean that the impact of rising CO2 levels is negligibly small, as has already been concluded by the NIPCC (Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change), a group of scientists skeptical of the U.N.-supported IPCC. It would also mean that wind energy, solar energy, and other “non-carbon” energy sources are not needed and are in fact counterproductive. It would remove the need for alternative fuels such as ethanol (which might please many true environmentalists). It would also mean that carbon trading, cap and trade, and fanciful schemes for carbon capture and sequestration would all end up in the dustbin of history.

Read the rest here


1. Oliver K. Manuel - November 5, 2010

Deep Roots of Climate Scandal

Climatologists learned the tricks that space scientists used during the space era to keep the following cycle of federal research funds flowing:

1. NAS reviews budgets of funding agency (NASA, DOE, EPA, etc).

2. Finding agency (NASA, EPA, etc.) gives funds to scientist.

3. Scientist reports that research supports NAS views.

4. Agency puts this finding in next budget for NAS review.

5. NAS recommends more funds for the funding agency.

6. Funding agency gives more funds to favorite scientists.

The above cycle repeats endlessly. It worked well in the space age!

That is why students of astronomy, astrophysics, climatology, cosmology, and physics received empirically falsified information today as scientific facts:

1. The Sun is a giant ball of Hydrogen (H).
2. H-fusion heats the Sun and the Earth.
3. Solar neutrinos just oscillate away as needed..
4. Neutron repulsion cannot be a source of energy.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo

2. C Monster - November 5, 2010

I would celebrate such clarity with a towering bonfire

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: