A cunning bid to shore up the ruins of the IPCC September 4, 2010
Posted by honestclimate in Discussions.Tags: climate change, Climategate, global warming, ipcc, Rajendra Pachauri
trackback
A cunning bid to shore up the ruins of the IPCC
By Christopher Booker
Telegraph.co.uk, 4 September 2010
Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Photo: EPA
A report on the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, on behalf of the world’s leading scientific academies, last week provoked even some of the more committed believers in man-made global warming to demand the resignation of Dr Rajendra Pachauri as chairman of the IPCC. But is the report all that it seems?
Last winter, the progress of this belief – that the world faces catastrophe unless we spend trillions of dollars to halt global warming – suffered an unprecedented reverse. In Copenhagen, the world’s leaders failed to agree a treaty designed to reshape the future of civilisation. This coincided with a series of scandals that blew up around the IPCC’s 2007 report.
Since then several inquiries, including three into the leaked “Climategate” emails, have tried to hold the official line, all following a consistent pattern. Each has made a few peripheral criticisms, for plausibility, while deliberately avoiding the main issue. Each has then gone on to put over the required message: that the science of global warming remains unchallenged
Read the rest here
An Honest Climate Debate 
The UN’s IPCC has – in alliance with Al Gore, world leaders and the research agencies they control, the news media, the most influential research journals (Nature, Science, PNAS, etc.), public TV (BBC, PBS, etc), the Norwegian Nobel Prize Committee, etc. – tried to promote three falsehoods as scientific facts:
1. Man-made CO2 induced global warming.
2. The core of the Sun is Hydrogen (H), like the top of the Sun’s atmosphere.
3. H-fusion powers the Sun and can supply our future energy needs.
These items of propaganda are falsified by experimental observations:
1. The geologic record of continuous climate change coupled with cyclic changes in the Sun is well-established, as is symbiosis of the exhaust product of animal-life (CO2) with the intake food for plant-life [See” “Earth’s heat source – the Sun”, Energy & Environment 20, 131-144 (2009): http://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0704 ]
2. Any school child of average mental ability would suspect that the model of a Hydrogen-filled Sun is false if told that Hydrogen, the lightest of all elements comprises 91% of the atoms at the top of the Sun’s atmosphere, that Helium, the next lightest element comprises 9%, and that the other 81 heavier elements comprise less that 0.2% of the atoms at the top of the Sun’s atmosphere. Space-age measurements confirmed the obvious: “The Sun is a plasma diffuser that sorts atoms by mass” [Physics of Atomic Nuclei 69, 1847-1856 (2006): http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0609509 ].
3. Nuclear rest mass data and precise data from space-age measurements show that
a.) Neutron repulsion powers the Sun [“The Sun’s origin, composition and source of energy”, Lunar & Planet. Sci. Conf. XXXII, paper 1041 (2001): http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2001/pdf/1041.pdf ], and
b.) Neutron repulsion releases more nuclear energy than fusion [“Neutron repulsion”: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10640850/Neutron_Repulsion.pdf ].
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Emeritus Professor
Nuclear & Space Science
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Isn’t he sueing the Daily Telegraph? For allegations unproven. According to India Times he is.
If the world is warming, good. We are coming out of a 500 year mini ice age. This AGW and Carbon Trading in EU is a scam. It isn’t working. Sustainability yes obviously, and we will adapt to
whatever climate we live in.
Climate is what we expect – weather is what we get. And weather kills us. The UN IPCC is a political movement driven by parties who wish to financially benefit from richer countries.
“This will land us, on the Government’s own figures, with by far the biggest bill we have ever faced: up to £18 billion every year for the next 40 years”
Rescind the legislation. It was based on fraudulent information.