Exposing the truth about the Man-Made Climate Change theory
Climate Debate – Bolt vs Penberthy: Who’s right?
Via AdelaideNow, November 27, 2009
-Andrew Bolt argues global warming is a giant scientific fraud <click here>
-David Penberthy says we should trust the experts <click here >.
Who do you believe?
Climate Change Alarmism Timeline: 1895-2009
By A W Montford 
Global Warming: The Missing Science
Surprising Truths About Climate Change By Harold Ambler
How Mother Nature Fooled the World's Top Climate Scientists. 
Frederick Bailey
The Skeptics Handbook by Jo Nova
ClimateGate: 30 Years in the making. 
Climate: The Counter-Consensus by Professor Bob Carter 
Steven Mosher, Thomas W. Fuller 
by Donna Laframboise
The Seriously Inconvenient Truth About Global Warming
Guide to climate change for pupils, parents and punters. By Professor Ian Plimer
Professor Garth W Paltridge
By Steve Goreham
The Past and Future of Climate, By David Archibald 
Global Warming: The Missing Science
The global climate portal
Keeping tabs on Alarmist Predictions
The true cost of the global warming hysteria. The documentary that Al Gore does NOT want the world to see.
Global Freeze
USA Breaking Weather News
Australian Breaking Weather News New Zealand Breaking Weather News
Made in Australia
This website says NO to Climate Fraud, because the debate is NOT over!
An Honest Climate Debate 
Andrew Bolt wins hands down he has the facts and question everything.
Penberthy just simply goes along with the tribal mob.
andrew bolt argues totally from a political view. i have yet to read one article by him that eludes to the science of the issue. therefore he has no facts, just a political opinion. he questions things only from a political perspective. the ”tribal mob ‘ are the worlds foremost experts in the field. the likes of exxon consultants like fred singer, who once commented that ” nicotine is not addictive [‘when he was a consultant for the tobacco industry ] are bolts main sources. making his entire argument invalid