Exposing the truth about the Man-Made Climate Change theory
UK Met Office Christmas wishlist
By the blogowner, honestclimate, December 25, 2008
Climate Change Alarmism Timeline: 1895-2009
By A W Montford 
Global Warming: The Missing Science
Surprising Truths About Climate Change By Harold Ambler
How Mother Nature Fooled the World's Top Climate Scientists. 
Frederick Bailey
The Skeptics Handbook by Jo Nova
ClimateGate: 30 Years in the making. 
Climate: The Counter-Consensus by Professor Bob Carter 
Steven Mosher, Thomas W. Fuller 
by Donna Laframboise
The Seriously Inconvenient Truth About Global Warming
Guide to climate change for pupils, parents and punters. By Professor Ian Plimer
Professor Garth W Paltridge
By Steve Goreham
The Past and Future of Climate, By David Archibald 
Global Warming: The Missing Science
The global climate portal
Keeping tabs on Alarmist Predictions
The true cost of the global warming hysteria. The documentary that Al Gore does NOT want the world to see.
Global Freeze
USA Breaking Weather News
Australian Breaking Weather News New Zealand Breaking Weather News
Made in Australia
This website says NO to Climate Fraud, because the debate is NOT over!
LOL! U kick *ss*s!🙂
Water vapour is the most important green house gas followed by methane. The third most important greenhouse gas is CO2, and it does not correlate well with global warming or cooling either; in fact, CO2 in the atmosphere trails warming which is clear natural evidence for its well-studied inverse solubility in water: CO2 dissolves in cold water and bubbles out of warm water. The equilibrium in seawater is very high, making seawater a great ‘sink’; CO2 is 34 times more soluble in water than air is soluble in water.
Correlation is not causation to be sure. The causation has been studied, however, and while the radiation from the sun varies only in the fourth decimal place, the magnetism is awesome. As I understand it, the hypothesis of the Danish National Space Center goes as follows:
Quiet sun → reduced magnetic and thermal flux = reduced solar wind → geomagnetic shield drops → galactic cosmic ray flux → more low-level clouds and more snow → more albedo effect (more heat reflected) → colder climate
Active sun → enhanced magnetic and thermal flux = solar wind → geomagnetic shield response → less low-level clouds → less albedo (less heat reflected) → warmer climate
That is how the bulk of climate change might work, coupled with (modulated by) sunspot peak frequency there are cycles of global warming and cooling like waves in the ocean. When the waves are closely spaced, the planets warm; when the waves are spaced farther apart, the planets cool.
Using a box of air in a Copenhagen lab, physicists traced the growth of clusters of molecules of the kind that build cloud condensation nuclei. These are specks of sulphuric acid on which cloud droplets form. High-energy particles driven through the laboratory ceiling by exploded stars far away in the Galaxy – the cosmic rays – liberate electrons in the air, which help the molecular clusters to form much faster than climate scientists have modeled in the atmosphere. That may explain the link between cosmic rays, cloudiness and climate change.
The ultimate cause of the solar magnetic cycle may be cyclicity in the Sun-Jupiter centre of gravity. We await more on that. In addition, although the post 60s warming period is over, it has allowed the principal green house gas, water vapour, to kick in with humidity, clouds, rain and snow depending on where you live to provide the negative feedback that scientists use to explain the existence of complex life on Earth for 550 million years. The planet heats and cools naturally and our gasses are the thermostat. Check the web site of the Danish National Space Center.
Keeping in mind that windmills are hazardous to birds, be wary of the unintended consequences of the all-knowing environmental lobby groups.
Please add ‘data on arctic ice extent being less or, at worst, no more than the worst on record’.
Have you noticed the daily arctic ice curve at NSIDC? 2 weeks of no increase until it meets the 2007 curve. Now, miraculously, it is going up again as normal.
I am not accusing NSIDC of fraud, however the striking coincidence should surely raise the interest of those ensuring that data put into the public domain is based on sound scientific principles…..
It may of course all be true. Coincidences do happen. And I will not challenge it if the data methodologies are in the public domain and available for critical scrutiny…..
But taxpayers’ money shouldn’t be spent on science which suborns itself to political religions. Should it?