Solar Cycles Cause Global Warming & Cooling June 5, 2011
Posted by honestclimate in Discussions.Tags: climate change, global warming, solar cycles
trackback
Solar Cycles Cause Global Warming & Cooling
By Nick Anthony Fiorenza
ICECAP, June 3, 2011
Planetary warming has also been observed on Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, and on Neptune’s largest moon Triton during the decades following the peak of the “Solar Grand Maximum” – wonder why – there are no humans there! And Pluto is moving further from the sun in its orbit, thus it should be cooling, but instead it is warming. This is but one blatant indicator that suggests that the climate change on Earth is due to solar changes and our intersellar environment rather than mere human antics.
More importantly, the Sun is now changing from its Solar Grand Maximum to its Solar Grand Minimum. The Earth heats up after a Solar Grand Maximum, lagging a bit after the peak. With a Solar Grand Minimum now on its way, a “global cooling” may be on the horizon–a natural oscillation occurring in much longer solar cycles.
Latest science reveals that sharp increases in global warming “precede” sharp increases in CO2–not the other way around. Global warming causes more CO2 to be released form the oceans. Current research also shows that Earth’s oceans are now beginning to cool. It is also now clear that temperatures over the last century correlate far better with cycles in oceans than they do with carbon dioxide; and, the temperature cycles in oceans are caused by cycles of the sun.
Let the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) advocates, as well as the media, continue to ignore all of this, perpetuating fear and advocating spending billions of dollars on non-solutions. Although humans contribute to greenhouse gases, the overall effect is a tiny fraction compared to natural causes. To say humans are the cause of global warming; and to also make predictions that global warming will continue to increase is simply inaccurate. This is not to ignore the silver lining of the global warming scare, as humanity must certainly learn to participate in harmony with nature, with the breath of the Earth and with her land and oceans; and with the cycles of the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars.
Read the rest here
“Let the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) advocates, as well as the media, continue to ignore all of this, perpetuating fear and advocating spending billions of dollars on non-solutions.
Although humans contribute to greenhouse gases, the overall effect is a tiny fraction compared to natural causes.”
I agree. Numerous experimental observations and measurements have supported the above conclusion since Jose reported it in 1965. E.g.,
P. D. Jose (1965) “Sun’s motion and sunspots”, Astron. J., 70, 193-200.
And now 46 years and many research papers later:
Ivanka Charvátová (2011) confirms: Climate change is caused by changes in solar inertial motion (SIM):
http://www.klimaskeptik.cz/news/interview-with-dr-ivanka-charvatova-csc-from-gfu/
Government science became a tool of government propaganda sometime between 1965 and 2011, as Eisenhower warned might happen in 1961:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ike.htm
“In this revolution, research has become central, it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government. . . . . ”
“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is GRAVELY TO BE REGARDED.”
“Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that PUBLIC POLICY COULD ITSELF BECOME THE CAPTIVE OF A SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL ELITE.”
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
We know that global warming is accelerating and that it’s due to anthropogenic influences (mainly our emissions of greenhouse gases), not the sun. We’re well on course for over 2C of warming just from fast feedbacks alone, and that is more than enough to trigger catastrophic positive feedbacks from ice albedo and the carbon cycle, so it’s almost certainly too late now to avoid the Earth moving to a much hotter climate state, regardless of what we do now.
We will find out how many humans a Cretaceous-like climate can support. It’s probably going to be just a few hundred million.
We know that global warming is accelerating and that it’s due to anthropogenic influences (mainly our emissions of greenhouse gases), not the sun. We’re well on course for over 2C of warming just from fast feedbacks alone, and that is more than enough to trigger catastrophic positive feedbacks from ice albedo and the carbon cycle, so it’s almost certainly too late now to avoid the Earth moving to a much hotter climate state, regardless of what we do now.
We will find out how many humans a Cretaceous-like climate can support. It’s probably going to be just a few hundred million.
“Although humans contribute to greenhouse gases, the overall effect is a tiny fraction compared to natural causes”
A 40% increase in atmospheric CO2, the most important long-lived greenhouse gas, is far from ‘tiny’. That’s why it’s having such a large warming effect on the climate.
Icarus62. You are so far off this planet mate.
Cretaceous period, mate the continents had not separated then and dinosaurs ruled the world. There was massive volcanic and seismic activity, and the atmosphere wasn’t the same as it today.
Humans and their precursors only evolved 4 million
years ago. The present world temps are not as high
as the Medieval and Roman Warm periods, and don’t put your Ugg boots away yet.
Go into your church of climatatology and pray for the world to get colder. And your prayers will be
answered and carbon traders will be cryin’ into their pretzels. Saying “Oh dear we were mislead by fraudsters, and lost alll our bit of money.” Yeah.
Money is the root of all evil, and don’t blame us
You blame the ones who have lied to you. Al Gore,
WWF, The Greens, Michael Mann, James Hansen, and take it like a man. You have been conned.
Bush bunny:
“There was massive volcanic and seismic activity, and the atmosphere wasn’t the same as it today.”
Exactly my point. We’re heading back towards that Cretaceous atmosphere by pumping hundreds of billions of tons of global warming gases back into it. Did you know that was why it was so hot tens of millions of years ago?
This report is a joke. It talks of climate related corruption but omits Climategate; etc
World Corruption Report: Climate Change, Transparency International,
http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2011/gcr_climate_change
Please react to this
Good article..interesting
All the people who think climate change isnt being caused by humans are truly in denial.
The government is too greedy to invest in any money into finding solutions and so they made up phony facts that are making people like most of you commenting here believe that scientists are dillusional, which they aren’t.
bush bunny:
your the one thats being conned
Iola, guess what, we humans aren’t that important to have any influence on climate change. Environmental degradation yes, but climate change is dictated by far more universal forces than Homo sapien sapiens. Do your research or buy a book on the Little Ice Age, eh.
See this new paper, in press: “A shared frequency set between the historical mid-latitude aurora records and the global surface temperature,” J Atmos Solar-Terr Physics, in press (2011)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682611002872
Excellent reference Oliver and worth a read by all, but I doubt that many will even give it a glance because their minds are already made up. Science requires evidence but politics doesn’t.
Although humans contribute to greenhouse gases, the overall effect is a tiny fraction compared to natural causes. To say humans are the cause of global warming; and to also make predictions that global warming will continue to increase is simply inaccurate.
Finally, some rationale human beings. We have a (very) minor influence on a cycle that has been naturally occurring for millions of years. We need to separate the discussions of “Global Warming” and “Pollution”. Only one of these two topics can and should be controlled, and once that’s realized we just might have a shot at making a difference.